Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 06:06

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Playdate’s second season is off to a great (and very weird) start - The Verge
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Do you have any problem dating a younger man?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Resident Evil Requiem: Release Date, Gameplay, And Everything We Know So Far - GameSpot
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Could Patriots cut Stefon Diggs and owe him nothing? It’s complicated. - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is it true that most women like alpha males?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.